Our Methodology

How We Build Your Plan

8 pillars of training science. 50+ rules. Every one cited. This is what makes Sti different from asking ChatGPT to write you a training plan.

Source Credibility

Not all evidence is equal

Every source in our methodology is classified by tier. New research must meet Tier B or above to modify any rule.

S

Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, RCT meta-analyses

Gold standard
A

Published research in sports science journals (PubMed, BJSM, IJSPP, Sports Med, MSSE)

High
B

Books by coaches with proven track records (Johnston/House, Koop, Daniels)

High
C

Expert practitioners with results (UTMB-winning coaches, elite athletes)

Medium-high
D

Community consensus (r/ultrarunning, iRunFar, coach blogs)

Medium
F

Random blogs, AI-generated content, unsourced claims

Rejected

Automated Validation

Coach-checked. Every time.

Every plan passes through an automated coach validator before you see it. Here's what the validator checks:

check_circle

Phase-specific intensity distribution present (not blanket 80/20)

check_circle

Base phase duration correct for athlete experience tier

check_circle

Volume progression uses single-session spike constraint

check_circle

Course-specific notes on all key workouts

check_circle

Phase ordering correct: Base → Build → Peak → Taper

check_circle

Taper gradient: 41-60% reduction, maintains intensity and frequency

check_circle

Week 1 volume ≤ 110% of current weekly volume

check_circle

Gut training protocol present with progressive carb targets

check_circle

Strength training is heavy load + plyometrics (not light circuits)

check_circle

Downhill sessions at correct frequency (every 14-21 days)

check_circle

Mental rehearsal embedded in peak long runs

check_circle

Sleep treated as a planning variable

Ready to train with science, not vibes?

Build My Plan — $39